WHEATLEY (
testgasm
) wrote
in
theblogger
2012-07-11 11:03 pm (UTC)
no subject
[
The answer is, perhaps, disturbingly immediate, and predictably doesn't explain anything at all.
]
For science.
[
He does, at least, realize that's kind of vague.
]
We'd test, you know. Different inventions.
(
268 comments
)
Post a comment in response:
From:
Anonymous
OpenID
Identity URL:
Log in?
Dreamwidth account
Account name
Password
Log in?
If you don't have an account you can
create one now
.
Subject
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
Formatting type
Casual HTML
Markdown
Raw HTML
Rich Text Editor
Message
[
Home
|
Post Entry
|
Log in
|
Search
|
Browse Options
|
Site Map
]
no subject
For science.
[He does, at least, realize that's kind of vague.]
We'd test, you know. Different inventions.